{"product_id":"why-we-argue-and-how-we-should-a-guide-to-political-disagreement-in-an-age-of-unreason-paperback","title":"Why We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason - Paperback","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp style=\"text-align: right;\"\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/reportcopyrightinfringement.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eReport copyright infringement\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eby \u003cb\u003eScott Aikin\u003c\/b\u003e (Author), \u003cb\u003eRobert Talisse\u003c\/b\u003e (Author)\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMany rational people shudder at what passed for critical discourse in the 2016 U.S. elections.　 In this timely \u003ci\u003e2\u003csup\u003end\u003c\/sup\u003e　 Edition\u003c\/i\u003e of \u003ci\u003eWhy We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason\u003c\/i\u003e, Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse double-down on their call for the necessity of proper argumentation, for one's own cognitive health and for the health of democracy.　 The lively style that ran through the \u003ci\u003e1st Edition\u003c\/i\u003e is retained in the \u003ci\u003e2nd\u003c\/i\u003e, with examples drawn from Trump, Clinton, their spokespeople, and other candidates.　 Other updates to the \u003ci\u003e2nd Edition\u003c\/i\u003e include an augmented chapter on online discourse, a new chapter on televised debate, expanded \"For Further Thought\" sections, and a more robust companion website.　　　 \u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch3\u003eAuthor Biography\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScott F. Aikin\u003c\/strong\u003e is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. His previous books include \u003ci\u003eEvidentialism and the Will to Believe \u003c\/i\u003e(2014) and \u003ci\u003eEpistemology and the Regress Problem \u003c\/i\u003e(Routledge 2011).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRobert B. Talisse is W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University. He is the author of five books, including \u003ci\u003eEngaging Political Philosophy \u003c\/i\u003e(Routledge 2016), \u003ci\u003ePluralism and Liberal Politics \u003c\/i\u003e(Routledge 2011), and \u003ci\u003eDemocracy and Moral Conflict \u003c\/i\u003e(2009).\u003c\/p\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eNumber of Pages:\u003c\/strong\u003e 218\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eDimensions:\u003c\/strong\u003e 0.52 x 9 x 6 IN\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePublication Date:\u003c\/strong\u003e August 28, 2018\u003c\/div\u003e\n            ","brand":"BooksCloud","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":56231694008625,"sku":"9781138087422","price":97.7,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0958\/3486\/5969\/files\/u070m0hNHz9781138087422.webp?v=1789170954","url":"https:\/\/www.welibooks.com\/products\/why-we-argue-and-how-we-should-a-guide-to-political-disagreement-in-an-age-of-unreason-paperback","provider":"Welibooks","version":"1.0","type":"link"}